APHC010626772025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12041/2025 Between: 1. TUPAKULA RAVI, S/O LATE SIMHACHALAM, AGED 40 YEARS,R/O. GANDHI NAGAR, SALUR,PARVATHIPURAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND 1. DHANALA HYMAVATHI, W/O VINAYA PRAKASA RAO, AGED 34 YEARS,R/O D.NO. 58-21-4 HASH 1, GROUND FLOOR,SRI VENKATESWARA NIVAS, BUTCHIRAJUPALEM,NSTL AREA, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. BONU RAMA SHANKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. The Court Made the Following Order: The instant petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed by the Petitioner herein, seeking quashment of the order dated 14.10.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.80 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.46 of 2024 passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Parvatipuram. 2. Heard Sri B.Rama Shankara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State. 2 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition filed by the petitioner seeking permission to file a list of documents as additional evidence in the appeal, for the purpose of better conclusion and effective adjudication of the appeal, has been dismissed. Learned counsel further submits that the documents mentioned in the said petition are very important for the trial of the appeal and hence, he prays this Court to set aside the said order and permit the petitioner to file the list of documents as additional evidence. 4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the order passed by the learned Judge is a well-reasoned one, which calls for no interference by this Court, and therefore prays that the present petition be dismissed. 5. On hearing both sides and on perusal of the material on record, it is evident that the learned Judge has assigned valid reasons for dismissing the petition. The learned Judge opined that the documents in question were well within the knowledge and possession of the petitioner. During the pendency of the trial in C.C. of the year 2019, the petitioner who was convicted in the said C.C. and is now pursuing an appeal seeks to submit these documents and has filed an application to reopen the matter and receive them as additional evidence during the course of the appeal. Therefore, the impugned order does not call for any interference by this Court in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction. 3 6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed. ___________________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date : 20.11.2025 Asr 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Crl.P.No.12041 of 2025 Dt.20.11.2025 Asr