1 2025:CGHC:48937 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4809 of 2025 Anandam Villa Awasiy Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Through Its President, Anandam World City, Near Gad Colony, Kachna District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Chhattisgarh Through The Chairperson, 3rd Floor, Block -A, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh- 492002 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Housing And Environment Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh- 492002 ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Agrawal, Advocate. For respondent No.1 : Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Satish Gupta, GA. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 24.09.2025 1. This writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs: 2 “(10.1) That this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent no.1 (Chairperson, CG RERA) expeditiously decide the application Annexure P-1 (which has been filed under Regulation 9 of the CG RERA General Regulations, 2020 on dated 30/06/2025). (10.2) That, this Hon'ble Court may pass order that no any coercive steps against Petitioner Society may be taken by C.G.RERA, till disposal of application Annexure P-1 (filed under Regulation 9 of C.G.RERA General Regulation 2020) in the interest of justice. (10.3) That this Hon'ble Court may pass such further order(s) as the Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.” 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent-authority to consider and decide the pending application/representation of the petitioner Annexure P-1 within any specified time frame in accordance with law/rules. 3. Learned counsels appearing for the respective respondents submits that they are having no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considering facts of the case, nature of relief, submissions of counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage directing respondent No.1 to consider and decide the pending application/representation of the petitioner Annexure P-1 in 3 accordance with relevant rule/law/regulation preferably within an outer limit of ‘60 days’ from the date of receipt of this order. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with respect to merit of the case. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-