Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41645 (KAR)

SRI SHRISHAILA SOMANAGOUDA GOUDARA v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER

WP/30532/2024 · 2025-10-17

Jyoti Mulimani

Review Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41413 WP No. 30532 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 30532 OF 2024 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: SRI. SHRISHAILA SOMANAGOUDA GOUDARA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS S/O. GOUDARA R/AT MEDINAPUR VILLAGE, HUNGUND TALUK, BAGALKOT - 587112. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHISHEK HUDDAR, ADVOCATE) AND: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, N.W.K.R.T.C., GADAG DIVISION, GADAG - 582101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SANJEEV B.L., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41413 WP No. 30532 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Sri.Abhishek R.Huddar., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.B.L.Sanjeev., counsel for the respondent have appeared in person. After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the petitioner submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel Sri.Abhishek R.Huddar., submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the petitioner to withdraw the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not file a review petition or seek for recalling the order. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP,KMV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 26