VIJAY SINGH @ VIJAY CHOUDHARY S/O SHRI UDAIRAM CHOUDHARY @ UDARAM KHATKHD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/8342/2024 · 2025-01-23
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41643 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41643 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3488] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.8342/2024
1. Vijay Singh @ Vijay Choudhary S/o Shri Udairam Choudhary @ Udaram Khatkhd, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Flat No. S-2,plot No. 5-A, Shiv Nagar-2, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302039. 2. Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Samota S/o Shri Sagar Mal Samota,, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 11, Dhani Samotawali, Tehsil Khandela, District Sikar, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Jitendra Choudhary S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Choudhary, Aged About 29 Years, R/o 36, Shiv Shakti Vihar, Meenon Ki Dhani, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Ravindra Choudhary S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Choudhary, Aged About 33 Years, R/o 36, Shiv Shakti Vihar, Meenon Ki Dhani, Murlipura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Ankur Singh Tomar For Respondent(s) : Mr.Manvendra Singh, PP Mr.Hari Om Vyas JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 23/01/2025
1. The present criminal misc. petition under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been preferred for quashing of entire proceedings arising out of FIR No.173/2024 registered at Police Station Khatushyamji, District Sikar for the offences under Sections 331(6), 115(2), 324(5), 351(3), 126(2), 190 & 191(2) of B.N.S., 2023, on the basis of compromise between the parties. [2025:RJ-JP:3488] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-8342/2024]
2. It is stated at Bar that a compromise has arrived at between the parties and it is borne out from the compromise that the complainant is not inclined to proceed further in this matter. 3. This court vide order dated 11.12.2024 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of the factum of compromise between the parties and the Investigating Officer is directed to submit the verification report before this Court. 4. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, the parties have appeared before the Investigating Officer, who has verified the compromise between the parties and submitted his verification report dated 19.01.2025, in this regard. 5. The factual report dated 19.01.2025 is ordered to be taken on the record. 6. Learned counsels for the parties have placed reliance upon the judgments passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688.
Counsel for the complainant submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled between the parties, therefore, the complainant does not want to pursue the matter. 7. In view of the aforesaid compromise arrived at between the parties and the verification report dated 19.01.2025 submitted by SHO, Police Station Khatushyamji, District Sikar and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh (supra) and Laxmi Narayan (supra), this Court
[2025:RJ-JP:3488] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-8342/2024] deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 B.N.S.S.
8. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. Proceedings arising out of the FIR No.173/2024 registered at Police Station Khatushyamji, District Sikar for the above offences under Section Sections 331(6), 115(2), 324(5), 351(3), 126(2), 190, 191(2) & 117(2) of B.N.S., 2023 stand quashed and set aside. 9. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /122