SURENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI BIRBAL RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/1270/2025 · 2025-03-19
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4164 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4164 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1270/2025 Surendra Kumar S/o Shri Birbal Ram, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Street Gorisar Area, Gorisar Village Gorisar Gram Panchayt, Ratangarh, Tehsil Ratangarh, District Churu, State Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director, Board Of Secondary Education, Bikaner, Rajasthan.
2. Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Jaipur.
3. Joint Director (School Education), Churu Division, Churu. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Surendra Meel For Respondent(s) :
JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 19/03/2025
1. By way of filing this petition, a prayer has been made for considering the case of the petitioner for promotion by providing him reservation under the category of disabled persons.
2. Contents of the petition indicates that prior to filing this petition, the petitioner has approached the respondents- authorities by way of filing a representation for redressal of his grievances.
3. It appears that the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the respondents by passing a reasoned and speaking order.
(2 of 2) [CW-1270/2025]
4. This Court in the case of Pawan Meena versus State of Rajasthan in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024, has issued specific directions to all the concerned departments to decide the representation of the aggrieved person within a stipulated time, by passing reasoned speaking orders. In pursuance of the orders passed by this Court in the case of Pawan Meena (supra), a separate order has also been issued by the authorities for deciding the representation, in-spite of above, the representation submitted by the petitioner has not been
disposed of by the respondents for the reasons best known to them.
5. In view of the above, the instant writ petition stands
disposed of with directions to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as early as possible, by passing a reasoned speaking
order, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
6. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/44