Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41635 (AP)

S.K. Sazid v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WA/1134/2025 · 2025-10-29

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, R Raghunandan Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

/ APHCQ10566882025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADES AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT APPEAL NO: 1134 OF 2025 Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent is preferred agginst the Order dated 14.10.2025 passed in W.P.No.27609 of 2025 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1. S.K. Sazid, S/o S.K. Sai Baba, aged about 38 years, R/o H.No.17-13-3, Seethampeta, Krishna Nagar, Rajahmahendravaram, East Godavari District. 2. S.K.Singh, S/o Ravindra Kumar Singh, aged about 39 years, R/o F.No.29/16, APPM Township, Mallayyapeta, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District. 3. G.K. Krishna Rao, S/o Satyam, aged about 47 years, R/o F.20/4, APPM Township, Mallayyapeta, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District. ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District, Rep. by its Principle Secretary. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Rajahmundry (Urban), East Godavari District. 3- The Station House Officer, Ill-Town Police Station, Rajamahendravaram. 4.The District Cooperative Officer, Rajahmahendravaram. 5. Ch Suresh, S/o Vishwanadham, Aged about 60 years, R/o FF-2, Lakshmi Plaza, Teachers Colony, Lalithanagar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District. ...Respondents East Godavari District, lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Pe'tition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances istated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pjeasbd to direct the 2^^^^ and respondents to register the crime against the 5*^ respondent pursuant to the complaints dated 08.07.2024 and 05.08.2024 *4 lodged by the petitioners and to take appropriate action against the 5 respondent in accordance with law pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI VV N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondent No.5: The Court made the following order: th 0 f Bench Sr.No:-4 [3446] APHC010566882025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 1134 of 2025 ...Appellants S.K. Sazid and others Vs. ...Respondents The State of Andhra Pradesh and others ********** Mr. V V N Narayana Rao Advocate for Appellants AdvoQate(s) for Respondent(s): GP for Home for R.1 to R.3 CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 30*'’ October, 2025 P C : In view of the ratio of the judgment of the Apex Court in Ram Kishan Fauji V. State of Haryana and others [(2017) 5 SCC 533], the present writ appeal is not maintainable and the same is accordingly dismissed. It shall be open to the appellants to avail the remedies as are available under Igw. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- B. CHITTI JOSEPH DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to Sri VV N Narayana Rao, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CCs to GP for Co-operation, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] Two CD Copies 1. 2. 3. 4. RAM ^ \ HIGH COURT n DATE0:30/10/2025 JUDGMENT WA.NO. 1134 OF 2025 $( 0 6 NOV 2025 )S \ /o» WN^JyrrentSecJSSS^ DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL WITHOUT COSTS