[2025:RJ-JP:39400] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14803/2025 1. Ghanshyam Yadav S/o Shri Bhagirath Mal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Malakala, Johra, Mau, Sikar, Rajasthan. 2. Laxmi Lal Meghwal S/o Shri Moti Lal Meghwal, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Village Govla, Post Zink Smelter, Tehsil Kurabad, Udaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Vijay Pintoo S/o Shri Dhansukh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Bhargava Mohalla, Behind Old Power House, Nagaur, Rajasthan. 4. Nirmala Dhaka C/o Shri Vikram Choudhary, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Manglodi, Padampura, Nagaur, Rajasthan. 5. Ashok Kumar S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad Tagore, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Surpura, Post Sarai, Tehsil Udaipur Wati, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 6. Vinod Bala D/o Shri Raghuveer, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 04, Hdp Hardayalpura, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. 7. Narendra Kumar Regar S/o Shri Chhagan Lal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Bigga Bas, Shri Dungargarh, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 8. Mala Vishawat D/o Shri Chain Singh Vishawat, Aged About 45 Years, R/o 25, Ekling Colony, Hiranmangri, Sector 03, Mangwa Khera (Rural), Udaipur, Rajasthan. 9. Surendra Nagwariya S/o Shri Jagdish Nagwariya, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vpo Jeloli, Tehsil Jayal, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. 10. Mustkeem Mohammed S/o Shri Munna Ali, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Nanda Ki Dhani, Diggi, Tehsil Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan. 11. Arvind C/o Shri Ram Chandra Balai, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Sawai Laxmanpura, Sikar, Rajasthan. 12. Vikram Kumar S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Jeengar Mohalla, Kabutaron Ka Chowk, Phalodi, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. 13. Vimla D/o Shri Kashi Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Village Bishanpura, 12 Nrd-A, Dabla, Ganganagar, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:39400] (2 of 4) [CW-14803/2025] 14. Varma Dinesh Kumar Maniram S/o Shri Maniram Varma, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Seowa, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Churu, Rajasthan. 15. Revant Ram Jat S/o Shri Harji Ram Jat, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 02, Government Hospital Ke Pass, Sandwa, District Churu, Rajasthan. 16. Mukesh Kumar Jangir S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 06, Sesu, Dulchas, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. 17. Chandrakala Meena C/o Shri Jasram Meena, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Village-Post Sureli, Tehsil Uniyara, District Tonk, Rajasthan. 18. Rakesh Kumar S/o Shri Amar Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Alayla, Tehsil Bhadra, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. 19. Sunam Meena C/o Shri Rampal Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o V/p Tundila, Tehsil Bamanwas, District Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. 20. Kanchan C/o Shri Chena Ram, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Vpo Khuri Kalan, Tehsil Sanju, Degana, District Nagaur, Rajasthan. 21. Dinesh Kumar Chhipi S/o Shri Nemi Chand Chhipi, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Vpo Khera, Tehsil Bansur, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. 22. Pooja Yadav D/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Yadav, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Vpo Sandarsar, Via Kaladera, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 23. Saurabh Kumar S/o Shri Banke Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Adharsh Nagar, Sector No. 01, Bayana, Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 24. Anil Kumar S/o Shri Jaswant, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 12, Lalanawas, Nathwaniya, Gogameri, Nohar, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. [2025:RJ-JP:39400] (3 of 4) [CW-14803/2025] 2. The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. The District Education Officer, (Elementary Education) Headquarter, Bikaner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Jain For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 24/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during the recruitment process, petitioners were declared successful and while filing their preference, petitioners preferred their home districts as their first district for posting. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that one circular dated 18.05.2020 was issued by the Administrative Reform Department for granting first posting to the candidates selected through RPSC, RSSB or any other recruiting agency and as per the aforesaid circular, place of posting shall be assigned as per merit cum preference. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the persons lower in merit than the petitioners have although been assigned their home district, yet the petitioners despite giving their first preference, the same has not been considered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits that similar controversy was considered by this Court in the case of Kindar Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6507/2017) decided on 04.08.2021. [2025:RJ-JP:39400] (4 of 4) [CW-14803/2025] 5. In the light of above, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed of with directions to the petitioner to make a representation in the light of aforesaid circular dated 18.05.2020 and order dated 04.08.2021 passed by this Court in Kindar Vs State of Rajasthan (supra). In case, the respondents find that the case of the petitioners are covered by the aforesaid circular and order dated 04.08.2021 passed by this Court, then appropriate order for modifying their place of posting may be passed within a period of four weeks from the date of submitting a representation along with certified copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /53