Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4162 (JHR)

MAHADEO ASUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/742/2025 · 2025-06-20

Rajesh Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:16341 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.742 of 2025 .... Mahadeo Asur aged about 61 years, son of Late Sudhu Asur, resident of village Tuimu, P.O. Kurag, P.S. Senha, District Lohardaga .… Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner cum District Panchayat Raj Officer, Lohardaga, P.O. and P.S. Lohardaga, District Lohardaga 3. The Deputy Collector (Establishment), Lohardaga, P.O. and P.S. Lohardaga, District- Lohardaga 4. The Block Development Officer, Senha, P.O. and P.S. Senha, District Lohardaga 5. The Accountant General (A & E), Jharkhand, having office at A.G. More, Doranda, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi .... Respondents .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner : Ms. Saman Ahmad, Adv. For the State : Mr. Vishal Kr. Rai, AC to GA-IV For the AG : Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv. .... 04/20.06.2025 1. It has been submitted that the claim made in the present writ petition has already been satisfied and learned counsel for the petitioner has instruction not to pursue the present writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the other side have no objection. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Shahid/ uploaded