APHC010150022015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION Between: 1. SHAIK MOHAMMAD JULFIKAR ALI, S/O. SHAIK HABEEB, AGED 34 YEARS, OCCUPATION PRIVATE DRIVER, R/O H.NO:6 BHOIGUDA, BACKSIDE OF OLD GANDHI HOSPITAL, SECUNDERABAD 1. THE STATE OF A P, through P.S. B.V.Peta (Giddalur, Prakasam District) Rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court, A.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. L N BHADRIRAJU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following The matter was heard on merit on 19.11.2025. being listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1566 OF 2015 SHAIK MOHAMMAD JULFIKAR ALI, S/O. SHAIK HABEEB, AGED 34 YEARS, OCCUPATION PRIVATE DRIVER, R/O H.NO:6 BHOIGUDA, BACKSIDE OF OLD GANDHI HOSPITAL, ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF A P, through P.S. B.V.Peta (Giddalur, Prakasam District) Rep. by Public Prosecutor High Court, A.P. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) following Order : The matter was heard on merit on 19.11.2025. Today, the matter is listed under the caption “For Dismissal”. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3560] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA 2015 SHAIK MOHAMMAD JULFIKAR ALI, S/O. SHAIK HABEEB, AGED 34 YEARS, OCCUPATION PRIVATE DRIVER, R/O H.NO:6-5-475 A, NEW BHOIGUDA, BACKSIDE OF OLD GANDHI HOSPITAL, ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF A P, through P.S. B.V.Peta (Giddalur, Prakasam ...RESPONDENT Today, the matter is 2. It appears that against concurrent finding of an order of conviction by the learned Trial Court, the instant Criminal Revision Case has been preferred. 3. I have perused the order of sentence and conviction passed by the learned Trial Court as well as learned Appellate Court. 4. On careful observation of the findings, it appears that learned Trial Court has recorded the order of conviction and sentence against the present Petitioner by fixing several points for determination. The order of conviction has also mentioned the evidentiary value of the prosecution witnesses in detail and the documents placed by the prosecution has also been scanned. 5. On careful perusal of the observation of the learned Appellate Court, it appears that the Appellate Court has specifically decided the grounds of Appeal as mentioned by the Petitioner/ Appellant, he has also decided on the point for determination. I find no illegality and impropriety in the order itself. 6. Considering the same, I find no justification to interfere with the order of conviction passed by the learned Trial Court and confirmed by the learned Appellate Court. 7. Under the above observation, the instant Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as devoid of merit. The order of suspension of sentence passed by this Court during pendency of the instant Criminal Revision Case is hereby revoked. The Petitioner is directed to appear before the learned Trial Court within three (03) weeks from the date of passing of this order to serve out the remaining portion of sentence, failing which, learned Trial Court shall issue Non-Bailable Warrant against the present Petitioner to comply the order. Since the Petitioner is not present before this Court, let a copy of this order be served upon the learned Trial Court for ready reference. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ SUBHENDU SAMANTA, J Date: 27.11.2025 Note: Issue C.C by 28.11.2025 B/o KK THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHENDU SAMANTA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1566 OF 2015 Date: 27.11.2025 Note: Issue C.C by 28.11.2025 B/o KK