1 2025:CGHC:44171 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4625 of 2025 1 - Rudra Narayan Mishra S/o Aditya Narayan Mishra, Aged About 45 Years Presently Resident Of Village - Bhandi, School Para, Tahsil - Baikunthpur, Distt. - Koriya (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector, Baikunthpur, Distt. - Koriya (C.G.) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer, Baikunthpur, Distt. - Koriya (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar, Baikunthpur, Distt. - Koriya (C.G.) 5 - Jila Sahu Sangh, Though Its President, Jagdish Sahu S/o Sukhiram Sahu, Aged About 67 Years R/o Village-Shivpur, P.S. And Tahsil - Patna, Distt. - Koriya (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Upasna Mehta, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 01/09/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following relief: “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ/order/direction directing the respondent 2 no. 4, i.e. Tahsildar, Baikunthpur to reopen and conclude the revenue proceeding pursuant to the order dated 15.05.2025 (Annexure P/9) passed by Divisional Commissioner in revenue appeal no. within the stipulated time period. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ/order/direction directing the State authorities to take appropriate coercive and disciplinary action against respondent no. 4 i.e. officiating Tahsildar. 10.3 That, the Hon’ble Court further be pleased to grant such other relief as may be deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent no. 4 officiating as Tahsildar is not complying with the order dated 15.05.2025 passed by Commissioner, Division Sarguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) 3. Learned State Counsel submits that the present petition may be disposed of directing the respondent no. 4 to comply with the order dated 15.05.2025 in accordance with law. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection. 3 5. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of the counsels, respondent no. 4 is directed to comply with the order dated 15.05.2025 passed by Commissioner, Division Sarguja, Ambikapur (C.G.) in accordance with law, rules and regulations, expeditiously, as soon as possible, if there is no legal impediment. 6. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of. 7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima