Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41607 (RAJ)

SURESHCHAND S/O TARACHAND v. RAKESH KUMAR JINDAL S/O JAGDISH PRASAD JINDAL

CW/11830/2025 · 2025-09-26

Ganesh Ram Meena

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39778] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11830/2025 Sureshchand S/o Tarachand, R/o Adarsh Nagar, District Beawer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rakesh Kumar Jindal S/o Jagdish Prasad Jindal, Owner M/s Ghisulal Udhyog, Opp. Seervi Hostel, Ganeshpura, Beawer, R/o Jawhar Bhawan Marg, Beawer. 2. M/s Ghisulal Udhyog, Opp. Seervi Hostel, Ganeshpura, Beawer, Through Owner Rakesh Kumar Jindal S/o Jagdish Prasad Jindal, R/o Beawer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 26/09/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Arti- cle 227 of the Constitution of India with a challenge to order dated 18.10.2024 passed by the Additional District Judge No. 1, Beawar in Civil Appeal No. 57/2024, whereby the execution proceedings have been stayed subject to payment of mesne profit at the rate of Rs.10,000/- per month. 2. The grievance in the present writ petition raised by the peti- tioner is as regards to amount fixed as mesne profit by the court below and his prayer is for enhancement of the same. 3. After arguing at some length, counsel for the petitioner sub- mits that he may be allowed to not press the prayer for enhance- ment of the mesne profit at this stage and further prayed that the [2025:RJ-JP:39778] (2 of 2) [CW-11830/2025] Appellate Court may be directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the respondent tenant within a stipulated period. 4. Taking into consideration the overall facts of this case and the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court feels that the ends of justice would meet if the court below is directed to decide the appeal at earliest. . Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Additional District Judge No.1, Beawar to decide the Civil Appeal No. 57/2024 as early as possible preferably within a period of three months from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava/Satyendra/41