Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41606 (AP)

Yadala Sambasiva Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/12807/2025 · 2025-12-30

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010669342025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12807/2025 Between: YADALA SAMBASIVA RAO, S/O.ROSAIAH A-1AGED 32 YEARS, R/O. VENIGANDIA VILLAGE,PEDAKAKANI MANDAL,GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1 AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP,Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: KATCHALA CHANDRA SEKHAR PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2 Dr.YLR,J Crl.P.No.12807 of 2025 Dated 31.12.2025 The Court made the following: ORDER: The Criminal Petition has been filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’), seeking to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.1 on bail in Crime No.858 of 2025 of Nallapadu Police Station, Guntur District, registered against the Petitioner/Accused No.1 herein for the offence punishable under Sections 61, 103(1), 49 of the Bharatiya Nayaya Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNS’) and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. Perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, this is the second bail application filed by the petitioner/Accused No.1 seeking to release him on bail. This Court, in Crl.P.No.11827 of 2025, vide order dated 27.11.2025, dismissed the first bail application. There is no change in circumstances from the date of dismissal of the first bail application till the date of filing of the second bail application. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no preliminary charge sheet was filed by the Investigating Officer. However, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the preliminary charge sheet was filed by the Investigating Officer. 3 Dr.YLR,J Crl.P.No.12807 of 2025 Dated 31.12.2025 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and in view of the filing of the preliminary charge sheet, the accusations are well-founded against the petitioner/Accused No.1. Hence, there are no merits to grant bail to the Petitioner/Accused No.1 at this juncture. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is liable to be dismissed. 5. In the result, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Date: 31.12.2025 RSI 4 Dr.YLR,J Crl.P.No.12807 of 2025 Dated 31.12.2025 34 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 12807 of 2025 Date: 31.12.2025 RSI