Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 416 (UTT)

KAMRAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

BA1/2422/2025 · 2026-01-10

Rakesh Thapliyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA1 No. 2 4 2 2 of 2 0 2 5 Hon 'ble Rak esh Th apliyal, J. 1. Mr. Azmeen, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present applicant Kamran, S/ o Uved is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 22.09.2025, bearing FIR/ Case Crime No. 417 of 2025 at P.S. Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, wherein the applicant has been implicated for the offence punishable under Section 191(2), 191(3), 121(1), 132, 221, 352, 351(2), 324(3), 190, 196(C) , 109 of BNS 2023 and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is not named in the FIR and he is languishing in jail since 23.09.2025. The applicant has no criminal history and the only role which has been assigned to the present applicant that he was present at the time of incident, but there is no any evidence that he was actively participated in the procession. He also submits that the charge sheet has already been filed. 5. On the other side, Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State have not disputed this fact that the charge sheet has already been filed and the applicant has no previous criminal history. 6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the charge sheet has already been filed and the applicant has no previous criminal history, this Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves for bail. 7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant “Kamran” be released on bail on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 10.01.2026 Nahid