SUJEET SHUKLA v. UINON OF INDIA THRU SECRY. AND 4 OTHERS
SPLA/1424/2013 · 2025-09-07
Amitabh Kumar Rai, Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41595 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41595 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SPECIAL APPEAL No. - 1424 of 2013 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE AMITABH KUMAR RAI, J.
1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the appellant to press the appeal, nor has any adjournment slip been moved.
2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the special appeal has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.
3. Accordingly, the special appeal is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
4. In case the appellant feels that the matter survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 8, 2025 SP/ Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Abhishek Rai, Anurag Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (2013/7937), P.S.Tripathi (Amitabh Kumar Rai,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Sujeet Shukla .....Appellant(s) Uinon Of India Thru Secry. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SURYA PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad