- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42962 CRP No. 185 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 185 OF 2019 (IO) BETWEEN: 1. N. H. SHREYAS S/O N.J. SATISHA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, PROP: N.H.JAMBAPPA ADIKEI MANDI, NUT MERCHANT, W-12, MARK NJAM APMC YARD, SHIVAMOGGA CITY - 577 201 R/O VEERABHADRESHWARA NILAYA KUVMPU ROAD, SHIVMOGGA - 577 201. …PETITIONER (BY MS. H.T. ANNAPURNA FOR SRI. S V PRAKASH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. N JAYARAM S/O NATESH MUDALIYAR AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, ARECA NUT TRADERS PROPRIETOR M/S PUSHPA ARECA NUT TRADERS AMPC YARD SHIVAMOGGA CITY - 577 201 R/O SUPIRYA NILY 60 FEET ROAD, II CROSS, NEAR SHUBA MANGALA KALYANA MANTAP VINOBANAGARA SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42962 CRP No. 185 of 2019 2. N J SATISHA S/O LATE N.H. JAMBAPPA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/O VEERABHADRESHWARA NILAYA KUVEMPU ROAD SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. 3. KUM. SHARVANI D/O N.G.SATISHA AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O VEERABHADRESHWARA NILAYA KUVEMPU ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. …RESPONDENTS THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 01.01.2019 PASSED IN O.S.NO.43/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT SHIVAMOGGA DISMISSING THE FILED UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 11(d) OF CPC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42962 CRP No. 185 of 2019 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo which reads as under: "In the captioned petition the petitioner challenged the Order passed by the Court of learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Shivamogga on an application filed by the petitioner seeking rejection of plaint in O.S.NO.43/2018. Now the suit in O.S.No.43/2018 ended in compromise. Therefore, the prayer made in the above petition does not survive for consideration. Hence, petition may be dismissed as infructuous by allowing this memo in the interest of justice". Placing the memo on record, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn as it has rendered infructuous. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9 ct:SG