IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31347 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2022 Thana- SURYAGARHA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. Nasrin @ Nasrim Khatoon @ Nasrin Khatoon D/o Md. Nasim Firdoshi, R/o Maula Nagar, Talab Par, P.S. Manikpur, District Lakhisarai 2. Shajadi Begum, W/o Md. Guddu, R/o Maula Nagar, Talab Par, P.S. Manikpur, District Lakhisarai 3. Rukshana Khatoon W/o Md. Jashim, R/o Maula Nagar, Talab Par, P.S. Manikpur, District Lakhisarai 4. Shabana Khatoon W/o Md. Kalim, R/o Abgil Rampur, P.S. Mednichowk, District Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Aryan Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Priya Sharan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 21-07-2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail petition so far as petitioner no. 4 namely Shabana Khatoon is concerned. 2. The anticipatory bail petition stands dismissed, so far as petitioner no. 4 is concerned. 3. The petitioners (i.e. petitioner nos. 1, 2 and 3) apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 342, 323, 325, 448, 380, 354, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 4. Allegation against these petitioners is that they assaulted the informant and his family members by means of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31347 of 2025(2) dt.21-07-2025 2/3 iron rod, lathi while the informant was digging hole on the earth, for marriage ceremony. It is further alleged that all the accused persons took away jewellery and Rs. 50,000/- cash. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to petty dispute, a simple occurrence of maar-peet took place between the parties in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, are simple in nature and rest of the allegations are ornamental. Moreover, F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of 7 days without there being any plausible explanation of delay. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 6. Considering the simple nature of injuries and delay in lodging the F.I.R., let petitioner no. 1, 2 and 3, as named above, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Surajgarha (Manikpur) P. S. Case No. 158 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 7. This anticipatory bail application is, accordingly, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31347 of 2025(2) dt.21-07-2025 3/3 disposed of. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T