Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41591 (AP)

ANNAPAREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/22796/2021 · 2025-10-28

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010372362021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22796 OF 2021 Between: 1. ANNAPAREDDY SRINIVASA REDDY, S/o.Samba Siva Reddy, aged about 39 years,R/o.D.No.7-74, Nunna Village, Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District 521 212. ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Asst Commissioner of Police, East Division, Gannavaram, Gannavaram Mandal, Krishna District. 3. The Station House Officer, Gannavaram Police Station, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 4. K Vijaya Paul, S/o. Not known to the Petitioner working as ACP, East Division, Gannavaram, Krishna District. 5. Koppula Suresh Babu, S/o.Nagendra Rao, aged about 42 years, R/o. H.No.17-1-20/A21/A, Saidabad, Santosh Nagar, A.P.H.B Colony, Hyderabad, Telangana. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in interfering in civil disputes in O.S.No.22/2021 and O.S.No.87/2020 on the file of the court of Prl. Junior Civil Judge at Gannavaram in respect of the land of an extent of Ac.0-20 cents out of total an extent of Ac.0-66 cents in R.S.No.2/2 of Vedurupavuluru Village, Gannavaram Mandalam, Krishna District between the Petitioner and 5th respondent herein as arbitrary, illegal and violative of fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in the Civil Disputes pending in O.S.No.87/2020 and O.S.No.22/2021 on the file of Prl. Junior Civil Judge at Gannavaram in respect of property of an Ac.0-20 cents out of total an extent of Ac.0-66 cents in R.S.No.2/2 of Vedurupavuluru Village, Gannavaram Mandalam, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents:MD SALEEM The Court made the following order: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 22796 OF 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in interfering in civil disputes in O.S.No.22/2021 and O.S.No.87/2020 on the file of the court of Prl. Junior Civil Judge at Gannavaram in respect of the land of an extent of Ac.0-20 cents out of total an extent of Ac.0-66 cents in R.S.No.2/2 of Vedurupavuluru Village, Gannavaram Mandalam, Krishna District between the Petitioner and 5th respondent herein as arbitrary, illegal and violative of fundamental right guaranteed under Article 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the civil disputes between the parties and pass such..…” 2. Heard Sri Saig Gangadha Chamarthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that the police are not interfering in a civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil dispute between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Dated 29.10.2025 KKV THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 82 WRIT PETITION NO: 22796 OF 2021 Dated 29.10.2025 KKV HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.22796 of 2021 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 1 29.10.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV