Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41588 (PNJ)

SURESH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD

CWP/9451/2025 · 2025-04-03

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 139 CWP-9451-2025 Date of decision: 03.04.2025 SURESH KUMAR AND OTHERS ….PETITIONERS Vs. HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD ...RESPONDENT CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Ashwani Verma, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Aman Bahri, Advocate for the respondent. **** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondent to extend them benefit of step up of pay to make their salary at par with their juniors. 2. Mr. Aman Bahri, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent and filed Memo of Appearance, which is taken on record. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent, at the outset, submits that claim of petitioner is under consideration and Competent Authority would address their legal notice dated 29.10.2024 (Annexure P-13) within 3 months from today. 4. Counsel for petitioners agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 5. In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands disposed of. 03.04.2025 [JAGMOHAN BANSAL] manoj JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.04.04 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document