SURESH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD
CWP/9451/2025 · 2025-04-03
Jagmohan Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41588 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41588 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
139
CWP-9451-2025
Date of decision: 03.04.2025
SURESH KUMAR AND OTHERS
….PETITIONERS
Vs.
HARYANA STATE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD
...RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Ashwani Verma, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Bahri, Advocate
for the respondent.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J (ORAL)
1.
The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondent to extend them benefit of step up of pay to make their salary at par with their juniors.
2.
Mr. Aman Bahri, Advocate has put in appearance on behalf of respondent and filed Memo of Appearance, which is taken on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the respondent, at the outset, submits that claim of petitioner is under consideration and Competent Authority would address their legal notice dated 29.10.2024 (Annexure P-13) within 3 months from today.
4.
Counsel for petitioners agrees to the aforesaid arrangement.
5.
In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands
disposed of.
03.04.2025
[JAGMOHAN BANSAL] manoj
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable
Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.04.04 09:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document