Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:43827
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4604 of 2025 1 - Smt. Maya Devi Singh W/o- Late Krishna Kumar Singh, Aged About 69 Years R/o- Village Latiya Tahsil Akalatara District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Collector Janjgir-Champa District - Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3 - Nayab Tahsildar Akalatara District - Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 4 - General Manager K.S.K. Mahanadi Power Company Limited Nariyara Tahsil Akaltara District - Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 5 - Resoultion Professional K.S.K. Mahanadi Power Company Limited Registered Address - 4th Floor Room No. 06 Commerce House 2a, Ganesh Chandra Avenue Kolkata 700013
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. F.S. Khare, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mrs. Akansha Verma Dabhadkar, Panel Lawyer
Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge
Order on Board 29/08/2025
1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition on the following relief:
“10.1. That the Hon’ble Court may kindly be
2 pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondent no. 2 and 3 to initiate prompt action against respondent no. 4 and 5 and to provide the compensation and made the land of petitioner cultivable. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be call for the records for its kind perusal which relates to petitioner’s matter. 10.3 Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favor of the petitioner.”
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction may be issued to respondent no. 2 and 5 to decide the representation of the petitioner within a time frame.
3. Learned State Counsel opposed the submission made by the counsel for the petitioner.
4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties and perused the record with utmost circumspection.
5. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case,
submissions of the counsels, petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with all relevant documents before respondent no. 2 and 5 within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order and in turn respondent no. 2 and 5 are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, expeditiously as
3 soon as possible, in accordance with law, rules and regulations.
6. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/-
(Arvind Kumar Verma)
JUDGE Madhurima