Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41584 (BOM)

TUKARAM KONDIBA PATIL v. ANUBAI KONDIBA PATIL AND OTHERS

SA/538/2023 · 2025-03-19

Gauri Godse

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

20-SA-538-2023.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 538 OF 2023 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1007 OF 2019 Tukaram Kondiba Patil … Appellant/Applicant Vs. Anubai Kondiba Patil and Others … Respondents Mr. Drupad S. Patil for the Appellant/Applicant. CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J. DATE : 19th MARCH 2025 ORDER : 1. By order dated 29th September 2023 time was granted to take steps against deceased respondent no.1. Office remark shows that steps are not taken against deceased respondent no.1. Hence the second appeal stands abated against respondent no. 1 who is the original plaintiff. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant on instructions submits that even the appellant has expired in the year 2024. There are no steps taken to bring on record names of heirs of the appellant. 3. Hence, the appeal abates. The second appeal is therefore dismissed as abated. 1/2 rrpillai RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date: 2025.03.23 22:53:13 +0200 20-SA-538-2023.docx 4. In view of dismissal of the appeal, civil application is disposed of as infructuous. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 2/2