119 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-18636-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 04.04.2025 RAI RAVINDER VERMA ...PETITIONER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Ms Ishal Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Jaspal Singh Guru, AAG, Punjab. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to direct the Respondents to carry out their lawful obligation by taking an appropriate action on the Representations dated 13.11.2024 (Annexure P-2 & P-3) sent by the Petitioner to the Respondent No. 4 & 5 respectively and registering a case against the accused persons therein as per mandate of law laid down by the Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in "Lalita Kumari Versus Government of U.P. and others (2014) 2 SCC 1"; Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Sandeep Kumar submits that the representations dated13.11.2024 (Annexures P- 2 and P-3) have been considered by the authorities wherein the dispute Anuradha 2025.04.05 06:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-18636-2025 -2- involved in this case is of civil in nature and there is no criminal liability against the alleged accused persons in that complaint/representation. He would further submit that a civil suit is also pending between the parties at competent Court at Dera Bassi. In view of the above, the instant petition has become infructuous, hence, the same is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Ordered accordingly. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE 04.04.2025 anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No Anuradha 2025.04.05 06:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document