Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2957 of 2014 ======================================================
1.1. Most. Shushila Kuer Wife of late Bhairav Pathak
1.2. Chandra Bhushan Pathak
1.3. Birj Bhushan Pathak
1.4. Prem Bhushan Pathak Sl. No. (ii) to (iv) are the sons of late Bhairav Pathak) all resident of Hanuman Mandir, Bypass Road, shital tola, Ara, Ward no. 37, P.S. Ara Nagar, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through Collector, Bhojpur, Ara
2. Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Bhojpur, Ara
3. Land Acquisition Officer, Bhojpur, Ara
4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Nationa Highway, Road Construction Department, Ara
5. The Executive Engineer, National Highway, Western Division, Patna
6. Circle Officer, Sadar Ara, Bhojpur, Ara
7. Harendra Singh Son Of Late Dhaja Singh Resident Of Village- Shital Tola, Shivganj, P.S.- Ara, District- Bhojpur
8. Shivjee Singh @ Shivajee Singh Son Of Late Sudeshwar Singh Resident Of Village- Bhakura, P.O.- Pharna, P.S.- Ara Mufassil, District- Bhojpur
9. Chhote Prasad Son Of Devki Nandan Prasad Resident Of Village- Sitaltola, Bypss Road Ara, P.S.- Ara Nagar, Distt.- Bhojpur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Radha Mohan Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raghwanand, GA-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 5 30-01-2025 Heard Mr. Radha Mohan Pandey, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr. Raghwanand, learned GA- 11 appearing on behalf of the State.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that during pendency of this writ petition, the grievance of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.2957 of 2014(5) dt.30-01-2025 2/2 petitioners have been redressed, and as such, the present writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition.
3. Permission is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn as having become infructuous.
ajay/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U