- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49220 CA No. 29 of 2025 In CA No. 42 of 2024 In COP No. 57 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 29 OF 2025 IN COMPANY APPLICATION NO. 42 OF 2024 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 57 OF 2012 BETWEEN: 1. MS. HINA NAGARAJAN, MANAGING DIRECTOR AND CEO (KMP), 3518, DLF PHASE-4, DLF CITY, GURGAON-122001, HARYANA. 2. SRI. PRADEEP JAIN, CFO AND WTD, A-3-602, UNIWORLD CITY, SECTOR-30/41, GURGAON-122001, HARYANA. …APPLICANTS (BY SMT. LEKHA CHANDRA SHEKAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAGHURAM CADAMBI, ADVOCATE) AND: OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S. UNITED BREWERIES (HOLDINGS) LTD., (IN LIQUIDATION) ATTACHED TO HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, "CORPORATE BHAVAN", NO.26-27, 12TH FLOOR, RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G.ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 …RESPONDENT Digitally signed by THEJAS KUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49220 CA No. 29 of 2025 In CA No. 42 of 2024 In COP No. 57 of 2012 (BY SRI. SHRISHAIL NAVALGUND, ADVOCATE FOR OL) THIS COMPANY APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE SECOND AND THIRD RESPONDENTS UNDER ORDER I RULE 10 (2) OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908, READ WITH RULE 6 OF THE COMPANIES (COURT) RULES, 1959. THIS COMPANY APPLICATION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS THIS DAY AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Lekha Chandrashekar, counsel on behalf of Raghuram Cadambi, for the applicants and Sri. Shrishail Navalgund, counsel for the Official Liquidator, have appeared in person. Counsel for the applicant submits that an application in CA No.29/2025 is filed to strike out/ delete the second and third respondents from the array of parties, as they are not involved in the transactions. Counsel, therefore, submits that the applications may be allowed. Counsel for the Official Liquidator submits that whether respondents 2 and 3 are involved in the transactions or not is a matter for evidence. Hence, they cannot be struck down at this stage. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:49220 CA No. 29 of 2025 In CA No. 42 of 2024 In COP No. 57 of 2012 The Official Liquidator is justified in contending so. Whether respondents 2 and 3 are involved in the transactions or not is a matter of evidence. Hence, I decline to allow the application. Resultantly, C.A.No.29/2025 is rejected. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE KMV List No.:1 Sl No.: