Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41576 (RAJ)

RAGHVENDRA RAWAT S/O SHREE KOKSINGH RAWAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15905/2025 · 2025-12-19

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51399] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15905/2025 Raghvendra Rawat S/o Shree Koksingh Rawat, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Village Jatarti Richali Khurd Police Station Karhaiya District Gwalior Madhyapradesh At Present Panchyawala Sirisi Road Police Station Karni Vihar Jaipur. (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Javed Mohd. Khan, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 19/12/2025 1. This criminal misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 in respect of FIR No.265/2025 registered at Police Station Bindayaka, Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Section 8/21 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the FIR in question, whereas he has not committed any offence whatsoever. He further submits that even otherwise, recovery of smack measuring 13.34 gram has been shown from the petitioner, which is also in violation of Section 50 of NDPS Act. He further submits that the quantity of the contraband alleged to be recovered from the petitioner is even otherwise less than commercial quantity. There is no criminal antecedents relating to NDPS Act against the petitioner. He is [2025:RJ-JP:51399] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15905/2025] behind the bars since 12.11.2025. Hence, a prayer has been made to grant bail to the petitioner. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. In view of the fact that quantity of recovery of contraband from the petitioner is less than the commercial quantity and the mode of recovery has also been cautioned by the petitioner as well as the fact that there is no criminal antecedents against the petitioner in respect of NDPS Act, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Raghvendra Rawat S/o Shree Koksingh Rawat shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.265/2025 registered at Police Station Bindayaka, Jaipur (West) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court. [2025:RJ-JP:51399] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15905/2025] (iv) He shall regularly mark his attendance in the concerned Police Station on 25th day of every month. Concerned S.H.O. shall maintain the register of attendance of the accused-petitioner. (v) On repetition of similar nature of offence during trial, the instant bail shall stand automatically cancelled. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /144