[2025:RJ-JP:47247] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16875/2025 1. Surendra Kumar S/o Mala Ram, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Ward No. 06, Ramsara, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. 2. Deepak Kumar S/o Deshraj, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 44, Near New Nagar Parishad, Hanumangarh, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini Mr. Aamir Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with following prayers: “It is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Honble court may very graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and further be pleased to: 1. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed that the revised/Final answer key along with report of experts of Lecturer (School Education) English for Paper 1 may kindly be uploaded on its official website. 2. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondents be directed to give proper marks to the petitioners for the [2025:RJ-JP:47247] (2 of 3) [CW-16875/2025] disputed questions No. 6, 7 and 14 of Paper 1 of G.K. by considering their evidence in right perspective as well as by deciding the objections submitted by the petitioners. 3. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, impugned result dated 20.08.2025 of Lecturer be declared illegal and same be quashed and set aside as same has been issued without issuance of final answer key. 4. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, direct the respondents to give appointment to the petitioners if petitioners on the post of Lecturer English, after correcting the wrong answers in the answer key and award proper marks to the petitioners. 5. Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the Petitioners. 6. Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the Petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 19.03.2024 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14401/2021 titled as “Nisha Panwar Vs. Rajasthan Staff Selection Board and other connected matters” submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, in case of Ramdhan Kumawat Vs. State of Rajasthan S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10622/2014. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is disposed of in light of Nisha Panwar (supra) and Ramdhan Kumwat (supra). [2025:RJ-JP:47247] (3 of 3) [CW-16875/2025] 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /24