APHC010495542024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 25511/2024 Between: KANASANI ESWAR REDDY, S/O K. NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O 8TH LINE, VIDYANAGAR, MULAGUNTAPADU VILLAGE, SINGARAYAKONDA MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, ONGOLE SUB DIVISON, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTIRCT. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SINGARAYAKONDA POLICE STATION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T M K CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the Respondents 4 and 5 in interfering with daily life and liberty of the petitioner is highly arbitrary, illegal and violation of Art 21 and consequentially direct the respondents 4 and 5 to restrain from interfering with the daily life and liberty of the petitioner.” 2 2. Sri T.M.K.Chaitanya, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the Police are calling the Petitioner to the Police Station without there being any crime registered against the Petitioner and are interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. 3. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, earlier, three criminal cases have been registered against the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.12.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.25511 of 2024 Dt.20.12.2025 Dinesh