Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4157 (AP)

MANNAVA MALLESWARI v. POLA BHASKAR, IAS

CC/179/2025 · 2025-07-09

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010027852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 179/2025 Between: 1. MANNAVA MALLESWARI, W/O MALLESWARARAO AGED 60 YEARS, R/O 1-143 PATHURU (V), PEDAKAKANI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. POLA BHASKAR IAS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, BC WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SRI BHIM SHANKAR, PRESENTLY WORKING AS DIRECTOR, ECONOMICALLY BACKWARD CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR, SRI VISHNU TOWERS, KRISHNAVENI SCHOOL ROAD, PORANKI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. SMT S NAGALAKSHMI IAS, PRESENTLY WORKING AS DISTRICT COLLECTOR, EBC AND BC WELFARE WINGS, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SMT K MAYURI, PRESENTLY WORKING AS DISTRICT EEC WELFARE OFFICER, SOCIAL WELFARE COMPLEX,Z.P.OFFICE BACKSIDE,GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, for their willful disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 07.08.2023 in W.P. No. 18048 of 2023 and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SOMISETTY GANESH BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. 2. NIMMAGADDA VIJAYA SANTHI 3. T S RAYALU The Court made the following order: In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, the orders disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case has been complied with, the contempt case is liable to be closed. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS