Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41568 (AP)

JANGALA RAMESH v. THE ANDHRA PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION

WP/28841/2025 · 2025-11-10

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010553472025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 28841 OF 2025 Between: 1. JANGALA RAMESH, S/O CHELAMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO.7-10-15 NISTALAVARI STREET, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ANDHRA PRADESH INFORMATION COMMISSION, NH-16, SERVICE ROAD, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 2. THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITYCUM COMMISSIONER, CCLA, APIIC TOWERS MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER AND SUPERINTENDENT ADMINISTRATION COLLECTORS OFFICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER COLLECTOR OFFICE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri V.V.N.Narayana Rao, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Revenue and Sri P. Ajay Babu, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for General Administration. 2. Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, Ld. Asst. Government Pleader for Revenue has submitted the Written Instructions dated 08.11.2025 furnished by the Additional CCLA-cum-Secretary (FAC), O/o. Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, Guntur. Copy of it is supplied to the Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same is taken on record. 3. The above Written Instruction would indicate that the first Appellate Authority and the Additional CCLA had undertaken to dispose of the pending Appeal within thirty (30) days. Having taken note of this fact, this Court is of the opinion that the request made by the first Appellate Authority appears to be reasonable. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of at the admission stage, without going into merit, directing the first Appellate Authority (Respondent No.2) to dispose of the pending Appeal within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of uploading of this Order on the web-site of this Court. The Writ Petitioner is also directed to convey the gist of this Order to the Respondent No.2 as well as the District Collector, since the Respondent No.2 has already undertaken to dispose of the pending Appeal within thirty (30) days. 5. With these observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 3 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 11.11.2025 MNR 4 156 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No.28841 OF 2025 Dt.11.11.2025 Mnr