Medarametla Sesha Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/29505/2022 · 2025-10-30
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41567 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41567 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010484002022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 29505/2022 Between:
MEDARAMETLA SESHA REDDY, S/O AYYAPA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O BRAHMANA KRAKA VILLAGE, JALADANKI (M) SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
3. THE SUBDIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, KAVALI SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JALADANKI POLICE STATION, JALADANKI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M RAVINDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in opening and continuing the rowdy sheet against the petitioner in the 4th respondent's police station by virtue of the proceedings in C.N0.6/GL-HS-SDO.K/2018 dated 17.02.2018 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14, Article 19(1)(g) and Article 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents to discontinue the rowdy sheet against the petitioner.”
2
2. Sri M.Ravindra, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, no further orders are required in this matter, since the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous.
3. Sri V.Farooq, leaned Assistant Public Prosecutor for Home would submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:31.10.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.29505 of 2022
Dt.31.10.2025
Dinesh