APHC010495572022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 30336/2022 Between: KOPPARAPU RANI, W/O. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D.NO.28-120, KUMMARI GUNTA BAVI, VINUKONDA, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NARSARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VINUKONDA URBAN POLICE STATION, PALNADU DISTRICT. 5. CHITTEMSETTI PADMAVATHI, W/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O.OPP. KOTHA MACHINE, RAILWAYPET, VINUKONDA TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT. 6. CHITTEMSETTI MANEMMA, D/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, R/O.OPP. KOTHA MACHINE, RAILWAYPET, VINUKONDA TOWN, PALNADU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KATA SAMBASIVA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus challenging the action of the 4th respondent in threatening the petitioner to pay Rs.5,40,000/- in favour of respondents no.5 and 6 vyhile interfering into civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents no.5 and 6 and forcibly obtaining signatures on the promissory notes by the 4th respondent in the Police Station without having any jurisdiction, is illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere into the civil disputes between the petitioner and respondents no.5 and 6.” 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, based on the complaint given by one Lakshmi Mani Jyothi Chittemsetty in Spandana, Police called the Petitioner for enquiry and no crime is registered against the Petitioner. It is further submitted that the Police are not interfering with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.5 and 6. 3. Sri Kata Sambasiva Rao, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties, except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:20.11.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.30336 of 2022 Dt.20.11.2025 Dinesh