Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41559 (JHR)

CHINTWAN SINGH ALIAS CHINTAWAN SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./1314/2023 · 2025-12-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2025:JHHC:36578) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1314 of 2023 ------ 1. Chintwan Singh @ Chintawan Singh, aged about 63 years, son of late Nema Singh, resident of village Ganjhudih, PO – Baidhmara, PS – Harla, District- Bokaro. 2. Sushila Devi, aged about 55 years, wife of Chintwan Singh @ Chintawan Singh, resident of village Ganjhudih, PO – Baidhmara, PS – Harla, District – Bokaro. 3. Kiran Kumari @ Kiran Devi, aged about 27 years, w/o Rajesh Kumar Roy, d/o Chintwan Singh @ Chintawan Singh, resident of Agardi, Chandankiyri, PO – Kanak Chas, PS – Chas, District – Bokaro. 4. Rita Kumari @ Rita Devi, aged about 25 years, w/o Mithun Ray, D/o Chintwan Singh @ Chintawan Singh, resident of Agardi, Chandankiyri, PO – Kanak Chas, PS – Chas, District – Bokaro. … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Manju Kumari @ Anjana Kumari, wife of Pramod Kumar Singh, d/o Dulal Chandr Singh @ Dulal Singh, resident of RD – 8, Kalimela Tata Colony, PO – Jorapokhar, PS – Bhaura, O.P., District – Dhanbad. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY - For the Petitioners : None For the State : Mrs. Nehala Sharmin, Spl. P.P. For the Opp. P. No. 2 : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate : Mr. Suman Kr. Ghosh, Advocate ------ Order No:- 04, Dated:- 03rd December, 2025 No one turns up on behalf of the petitioners in spite of repeated calls. Learned counsel for the Opp. Parties submits that since there is no merit in this case, hence, the petitioners are not diligent in prosecuting this case. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P., is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 03.12.2025 Aditi