Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41558 (KAR)

MR. MOHSIN AHMED QURESHI v. JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED

WP/6736/2023 · 2025-10-08

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39518 WP No. 6736 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.6736 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. MR. MOHSIN AHMED QURESHI S/O LATE C. NISAR AHMED QURESHI AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS. 2. MR. MOHSIB AHMED QURESHI S/O LATE C. NISAR AHMED QURESHI AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NO.E1836 BRIGADE PANORAMA APRTMENT ANCHEPALYA KAMBIPURA MYSURU ROAD BENGALURU -560 060. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KALLESHAPPA K.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. JANA SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS JANALAKSHMI FINANCE SERVICES LTD) HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT "THE FAIRWAY GROUND & 1ST FLOOR SY NO.10/1, 11/2 & 12/2B OFF: DOMLUR, KORAMANGALA INNER RING ROAD, NEXT TO EMBASSY Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39518 WP No. 6736 of 2023 GOLF LINKS CHALLAGHATTA BENGALURU - 560071. REGIONAL BRANCH OFFICE AT DIVYASHRI CHAMBERS AT 11, O, SHAUGHNESSY ROAD 5TH FLOOR, 'A' WING OFF LANGFORD ROAD, SHANTHINAGAR BENGALURU -560025 REPRESENTED BY ITS ZONAL LEGAL MANAGER AND ASSOCIATED VICE PRESIDENT AUTHORISED OFFICER SRI. BABU SREEJITH. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. V. SURESH, ADVOCATE FOR C/RESPONDENT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-C DATED 01.02.2023 PASSED BY THE HONBLE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU IN CRL.MISC.1537/2022. DIRECT THE RESPONDENT BANK OF REDELIVER VACANT PHYSICAL POSSESSION OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTIES TO THE PETITIONERS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39518 WP No. 6736 of 2023 ORAL ORDER There is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. This petition is listed for 7th time for non- compliance of the office objections. Despite having been granted sufficient time, the learned counsel for the petitioners has failed to comply with the office objections. By order dated 10.03.2025, this Court had granted a final opportunity of two weeks time to rectify the said objections. This non-compliance indicates that the petitioners have no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-compliance with office objections. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB:List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8