Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41554 (RAJ)

GOPAL LAL VERMA S/O SHRI GOVIND SAHAY v. RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION

CW/14976/2025 · 2025-10-09

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41499] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14976/2025 Gopal Lal Verma S/o Shri Govind Sahay, Aged About 67 Years, Retired Senior Administrative Officer Of Rsrtc, Sikar Depot, R/o Villa No. 46, Orik Vedas, Omex City, Near Bad Ke Balaji, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Privahan Marg, Jaipur Through Managing Director. 2. Financial Advisor And Chief Accountant Officer, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Parivahan Marg, Jaipur 3. Chief Manager, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, Sikar Depot, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohammed Anees For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “by appropriate order, writ or direction, respondents be directed to grant payment of due provisional pension for the period of 01.04.2022 to 28.02.2025 with 6% p.a. interest; ii) Cost of litigation be awarded in favour of the petitioner; iii) Any other order, writ or direction which this Hon'ble Court deemed just and [2025:RJ-JP:41499] (2 of 2) [CW-14976/2025] proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /39