SMT.MAMTA NIGAM AND ORS. v. STATE OF U.P.THRU SECY AND ORS.
WRIA/13805/2013 · 2025-04-07
Vikram D Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41549 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41549 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 13805 of 2013 Petitioner :- Smt.Mamta Nigam And Ors. Respondent :- State Of U.P.Thru Secy And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Khare,Hari Ram,Rajesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.K.Rai,O.P.Lohia,Om Prakash Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
1. Sri Hari Ram, learned counsel for petitioner submits that although the amendment application has been filed on behalf of petitioners, but he is appearing only on behalf of petitioner no.2- Smt. Sandhya Singh. He submits that after filing of the present writ petition, petitioner no.2 was terminated and the termination
order was approved by order dated 2.9.2013.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner no.2 submits that he may be permitted to withdraw present writ petition with liberty to file afresh as the termination order is also required to be challenged.
3. In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty in respect of petitioner no.2-Smt. Sandhya Singh.
4. Insofar as petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4, namely, Smt. Mamta Nigam, Smt. Samriddhi Das and Smt. Shashi Gupta are concerned, no one has appeared in the revised list.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution in respect of petitioner nos.1, 3 and 4, namely, Smt. Mamta Nigam, Smt. Samriddhi Das and Smt. Shashi Gupta.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.4.2025 D. Tamang Digitally signed by :- DHIRENDRA TAMANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad