Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41548 (RAJ)

AYAN S/O USMAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/13928/2025 · 2025-10-17

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:42679] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 13928/2025 Ayan S/o Usman, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Kanwadi, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 17/10/2025 1. This criminal misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 in respect of FIR No.237/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) of B.N.S. and Section 66-D of I.T. Act. 2. It is submitted that even the contents of FIR would reveal that only on account of possessing mobile, the petitioner has been arrested on 22.09.2025 and there are no specific allegations of causing any fraud or cheating with any specific persons showing details of any alleged incident. It is submitted that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and the trial against the petitioner is likely to take considerably long time. It is submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the [2025:RJ-JP:42679] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-13928/2025] petitioner. Hence, the petitioner prayed for granting bail in the instant matters. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed this bail application. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. Considering the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and the offences against the petitioner are triable by Magistrate as well as looking to the nature of allegations, where specific instances have not been given to reveal commission of the crime, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this Bail Application is hereby allowed. The accused-petitioner Ayan S/o Usman shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No.237/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each. That apart, the accused-petitioner shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) He shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) He shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) He shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless his presence is exempted by the trial Court. [2025:RJ-JP:42679] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-13928/2025] (iv) He shall regularly mark his attendance in the concerned Police Station on 25th day of every month. Concerned S.H.O. shall maintain the register of attendance of the accused-petitioner. (v) On repetition of similar nature of offence during trial, the instant bail shall stand automatically cancelled. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /61