Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41547 (RAJ)

SHIVNARAYAN SOLANKI S/O SHRI SATYANARAYAN PARDI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

/11701/2025 · 2025-09-25

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:39679] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 11701/2025 1. Shivnarayan Solanki S/o Shri Satyanarayan Pardi, Aged About 23 Years, R/o B-133, Vishvanagar, Village Chak Vishvanagar (Kanera) Tehsil Bamori, P.s. Dharnauda, District Guna (MP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). 2. Jainarayan Solanki S/o Shri Satyanarayan Pardi, Aged About 21 Years, R/o B-133, Vishvanagar, Village Chak Vishvanagar (Kanera) Tehsil Bamori, P.s. Dharnauda, District Guna (MP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). 3. Surjan S/o Chandu, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Chak Vishvanagar (Kanera) Tehsil Bamori, P.s. Dharnauda, District Guna (MP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). 4. Giriraj S/o Shri Mohan, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Bilakhedi, P.s. Dharnauda, District Guna (MP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). 5. Vijay S/o Shri Ramcharan, Aged About 19 Years, Bilakhedi, P.s. Dharnauda, District Guna (MP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer). 6. Jeetu S/o Shri Madan Goma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Chak Vishvanagar (Kanera) Tehsil Bamori, P.s. Dharnauda, District Guna (MP) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent [2025:RJ-JP:39679] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-11701/2025] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Devanshu Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/09/2025 1. The present bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is filed by the applicants-accused 1.Shivnarayan Solanki S/o Shri Satyanarayan Pardi, 2.Jainarayan Solanki S/o Shri Satyanarayan Pardi, 3.Surjan S/o Chandu, 4.Giriraj S/o Shri Mohan, 5.Vijay S/o Shri Ramcharan and 6. Jeetu S/o Shri Madan Goma, seeking bail in respect of a criminal case registered as FIR No.121/2025 Dated 22.08.2025 registered at P.S. Bander Sindri District – Ajmer for the offence under Section 313 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the matter and the investigation against them is complete and they are no more required in investigation. He further submits that there are no chance of fleeing of applicants accused from the jurisdiction of this Hon’ble Court. He also submits that the applicants undertake not to repeat offence and cooperate with investigation/trial, which will take time. 3. Learned counsel for applicant submits that these petitioners have neither committed any offence nor they assaulted anyone. He further submits that only on suspicion about planing to commit a dacoity, these petitioners were arrested by police. He submits that neither there is any call nor [2025:RJ-JP:39679] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-11701/2025] conversation recorded to show that the present petitioners were engaged in preparation of any dacoity. He also submits that one criminal case is registered against Shivnarayan and Jainarayan whereas two against Surjan, Giriraj and Vijay and three against three cases were registered against Jeetu. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that the allegations are grave and serious in nature. He has also filed a report received from concerned Police Station. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. In the night of 21st - 22nd August, 2025, Amar Chand, SI, PS Bandar Sindari, District Ajmer, on an information found that six persons were planning to commit dacoity and further confirming the plan, the present petitioners were detained and arrested and a report under Section 313 of BNS was registered. One criminal case is registered against Shivnarayan and Jainarayan whereas two against Surjan, Giriraj & Vijay and three against three cases were registered against Jeetu. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicants-accused are no more required in the investigation and they are in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the [2025:RJ-JP:39679] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-11701/2025] case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicants-accused. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused 1.Shivnarayan Solanki S/o Shri Satyanarayan Pardi, 2.Jainarayan Solanki S/o Shri Satyanarayan Pardi, 3.Surjan S/o Chandu, 4.Giriraj S/o Shri Mohan, 5.Vijay S/o Shri Ramcharan and 6. Jeetu S/o Shri Madan Goma, is hereby allowed and the applicants-accused are ordered to be released on bail provided each of them furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicants-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicants-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicants-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/127