[2025:RJ-JP:41368] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15405/2025 Sharmila Wife Of Sh. Karan Singh, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Madu Ki Dhani, Tan Bhawthadi, Tehsil Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). Presently Posted As Teacher Level-2, Hindi, Rajkiya Balika Uchch Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Khanpur Mehrana, Block Singhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). (Employee Id- Rjjj200523004054) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Sachiv, Siksha Vibhag (Madhymik Siksha), Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Nideshak, Madhymik Siksha Vibhag, Bikaner, Rajasthan. 3. Zila Siksha Adhikari (Mukhyalaya), Madhymik Siksha, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailender Singh Balwada For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 10/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was initially posted as Teacher Level II (Hindi), in Mahatma Gandhi Government School, but on declaring surplus, she was transferred to Block Singhana, in violation of Clause 10 of directions dated 16.07.2025 issued by respondent No.2. He further submits that presently a post is lying vacant in Surajgarh Block to accommodate the petitioner, but due to some ulterior political reasons, she was not accommodated within same block. He also submits that after exercise of transfer, the respondents have [2025:RJ-JP:41368] (2 of 2) [CW-15405/2025] invited objections and petitioner has also submitted a representation, but same has not been decided till date. He submits that respondents are bound by the policy framed by them and if the representation of petitioner is considered in light of the policy then the petitioner would get posting within same block from where, she was declared as surplus. 2. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a fresh representation to respondents within a period of two weeks raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to dispose of the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, after considering policy as referred herienabove. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she has a right to re-approach the court with fresh petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /26