1 2025:CGHC:13858 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5189 of 2022 M/s Vinod Kumar Jain Having Its Registered Office At College Road Jashpur Nagar, District Jashpur (C.G.) And Side Office A-3, Jeevan Vihar, Opp. Airport Road, Telibandha, District Raipur (C.G.) Through Its Authorized Representative Shri Manish Somani S/o Late Shri Nandlal Somani, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Bms House, Moti Talab Para, Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary Department Of Skill Development Technical Education And Employment, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Skill Development And Enterpreneurship, Directorate General Of Training Employment Exchange Building Library Avenue, Pusa Campus, New Delhi. 4 - Engineer-In-Chief Public Works Department, North Block, Sector-19, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Director Directorate Of Technical Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Superintending Engineer Public Works Department, Bastar Zone, Jagdalpur, District : Bastar, Chhattisgarh 7 - Executive Engineer (E/M) North Bastar, Division No.1, Jagdalpur, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.03.24 17:15:54 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Harsh Wardhan, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. R.K. Gupta, Additional Advocate General For Respondent/Union of India : Ms. Anmol Sharma, Central Government Counsel Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 22.03.2025 1. Heard Mr. Harsh Wardhan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R.K. Gupta, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State/respondents No.1 & 2 and 4 to 7 as well as Ms. Anmol Sharma, learned Central Government Counsel, appearing for respondent No.3. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that by efflux of time, instant writ petition has become infructuous, as such, he does not want to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents have no objection. 4. Accordingly, instant writ petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh