Shaik Mohammad Haneef v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/37184/2022 · 2025-12-04
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41541 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41541 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010608272022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] FRIDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 37184/2022 Between:
1. SHAIK MOHAMMAD HANEEF, S/O HUSSAIN SHAHEB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS JAMPANI VILLAGE VENURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HOME DEPARTMENT REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY SECRETERIATE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TENALI RURAL POLICE STATION, TENALI
5. SRI YEDUKONDALU, FATHER'S NAME UNKNOWN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS SUB INSPECTOR OF POLLICE, TENALI RURAL POLICE STATION.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondents no 1 to 3 in not taking
action on Petitioner's representations dated 05/01/2022, 25/04/2022, 22/08/2022, and 26/05/2022 is illegal, arbitrary, and violation articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the 1 to 3 respondents to take departmental action against the 5th respondent as he misused his official power by not investigated petitioner's complaints dated 26/05/2022 in collusion with the accused with a view to making the accused to escape from legal punishment and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct respondents no 1 to 3 to take departmental action against respondent no 5 pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BASHEER AHMED Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 37184/2022
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“…to issue a Writ more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of respondents no 1 to 3 in not taking action on Petitioner's representations dated 05/01/2022, 25/04/2022, 22/08/2022, and 26/05/2022 is illegal, arbitrary, and violation articles 14, 19, and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the 1 to 3 respondents to take departmental action against the 5th respondent as he misused his official power by not investigated petitioner's complaints dated 26/05/2022 in collusion with the accused with a view to making the accused to escape from legal punishment and to pass…”
2. Heard Sri Basheer Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that despite several representations made by the petitioner, the respondent police, instead of registering a case for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 445 of the Indian Penal Code, registered a case under Section 408 IPC in Crime No.154 of 2022 on the file of Tenali Rural Police Station.
4. Sri V. Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaint lodged by the
petitioner, a crime was registered in Crime No.154 of 2022 under Section 408 IPC, the investigation was completed and a charge sheet has already been filed by the police.
5. In view of the aforesaid submissions, as investigation has been completed and the charge sheet has been filed, this Court is of the opinion that no further directions are required to be issued in the present writ petition.
6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, granting liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum, in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date 05.12.2025 KKV
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
326
WRIT PETITION NO: 37184/2022
Dated.05.12.2025
KKV
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO.: WRIT PETITION NO: 37184/2022 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
05.12.2025
Dr.VJP,J
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
(vide separate order)
________ Dr.VJP,J KKV