Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42943 WP No. 28758 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 28758 OF 2025 (GM-FC) BETWEEN:
SRI. K.PRADEEP SHENOY S/O K.RATHNAKAR SHENOY AGE ABOUT 37 YEARS R/A RATHNADEEP, 2ND MAIN ROAD, HAYAGREEVA NAGAR, INDRALI UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT- 576 102 …PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VARDHAN SHENOY K., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.PRITHVEESH M.K., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SMT. VINEETHA PAI K., W/O K.PRADEEP SHENOY
Digitally signed by MEGHA MOHAN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42943 WP No. 28758 of 2025
D/O K.VIVEKANANDA PAI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS PRESENTLYL AT L6-17-696 MANNAGUDDA GANDHINAGAR MANGALORE -575 003 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K.G.KAMATH, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN G AND WC NO. 18/2024 AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 17.09.2025 PASSED BY THE PRL. JUDGE FAMILY COURT UDUPI ON IA NO. XII IN G AND WC NO. 18/2024 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT HEREIN (ANNEXURE-A).
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42943 WP No. 28758 of 2025
ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed in I.A.No.12 in G & WC.No.18/2024 dated 17.09.2025 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Udupi whereby the Family Court had granted the interim custody of the child to the mother from 20.09.2025 to 29.09.2025.
2. When this matter came up before this Court, this Court had not interfered with the order impugned and also interacted with the parties and suggested that the matter may be amicably settled and they can settle all the disputes that are pending.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
order impugned is already worked out and nothing remains to be considered in this writ petition.
4. As it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that they will work out the possibility of settlement before the Family Court. In that view of the matter nothing remains to be adjudicated in this writ petition. Hence, this Court is passing the following:
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:42943 WP No. 28758 of 2025
ORDER i. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. ii. All I.As., in the writ petition shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
BN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12