Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41536 (RAJ)

MOHD AEJAZ AKBAR S/O ABDUL MAJEED v. THE UINON OF INDIA

CRLW/1152/2025 · 2025-10-09

Avneesh Jhingan, Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41122-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 1152/2025 Mohd Aejaz Akbar S/o Abdul Majeed, Aged About 47 Years, R/o H. No. 7-7775/6 Naya Mohalla, Mominpura, Gulbarga 585104, Karnataka (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur Rajasthan.) Through His Father - Abdul Majeed S/o Late Abdul Aziz, Aged About 75 Years, R/o H. No. 5-993/32/37/417, Gulshan E-Arfat Colony, Hagarga Road, Gulbarga University Police Station Kalaburagi, Gulbarga 585104 Karnataka. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Uinon Of India, Through The Ministry Of Home Affairs, Govt. Of India, Is-Ii, Division/legal Cell-1, 2Nd Floor, Major Dhyan Chand National Stadium, Near India Gate, New Delhi 2. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. Superintendent Central Jail, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tekchand Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. C.S. Sinha with Mr. Mayank Kamwar Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, Dy. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 09/10/2025 1. This petition is filed aggrieved of rejection of the prayer for forth parole. 2. The grievance raised is that the petitioner has suffered incarceration of more than twenty eight years after complying with the condition of the earlier three paroles surrendered within time, yet the prayer for forth parole has been rejected. [2025:RJ-JP:41122-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1152/2025] 3. Learned Deputy Government Advocate fairly submits that a circular dated 17.07.2025 has been issued with regard to considering the application for subsequent parole where the inmate had complied with the conditions of the earlier paroles. 4. In view of the above statement, the impugned order is set aside. The matter is remitted back to decide the application for forth parole afresh in accordance with law taking into consideration the circular dated 17.07.2025. 5. It shall be appreciated if the application is considered and decided expeditiously not later than three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 6. This criminal writ petition (parole) is allowed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J RIYA/21