Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41534 (JHR)

ISRAIL MIAN ALIAS MD. ISRAIL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(DB)/1443/2025 · 2025-12-04

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:36285-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 1443 of 2025 --- Israil Mian @ Md. Israil --- --- Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand. --- --- Respondent --- CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava --- For the Appellant : Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, Adv. For the Respondent : A.P.P 03/04.12.2025 Heard Mr. Kamdeo Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.09.2025 passed in M.C.A. No. 1927 of 2025 arising out of Tisri P.S. Case No. 35 of 2021 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Giridih, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that a dacoity was committed in the house of the informant and various articles including cash were looted. Submission has been advanced by learned counsel for the appellant that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the appellant. It has further been submitted that the appellant has been implicated on the confessional statement and he is in custody since 15.12.2022. Learned A.P.P has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant and has submitted that a motorcycle was recovered which was used in the crime and which was ascertained to be belonging to the appellant. Learned A.P.P adds that out of nine charge sheet witnesses, three witnesses have already been examined. It has also been submitted that the appellant has got criminal antecedents and he is accused in several cases in the State of West Bengal as well. Apart from the fact that a motorcycle which was used in committing the dacoity and which was recovered having been ascertained to be belonging to the appellant and the fact that the appellant appears to be an inter-state criminal apart from the fact that there 2 is a possibility of the trial being concluded in near future, we are not inclined to interfere in the impugned order dated 17.09.2025 passed in M.C.A. No. 1927 of 2025 arising out of Tisri P.S. Case No. 35 of 2021 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Giridih and consequently we dismiss this appeal at this stage. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Dated: 04nd December 2025 Shamim/ Uploaded on: 06 /12 /2025