IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 138 SAKINA AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Ms Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a official respondents at the hands of respondent dated 27.03.2025 (Annexure P 2. At the very outset, l submitted that the petitioner 27.03.2025 before the raising their grievances as not yet been considered and no action has submitted that at this stage, the directions are issued to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: SAKINA AND ANOTHER Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Ms. Meena Gupta, Advocate for the Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner at the hands of respondents No. 4 to 8 and to take action on dated 27.03.2025 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Superintendent of Police, grievances as mentioned in the present not yet been considered and no action has been taken thereon. submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would directions are issued to respondent No. 2- Superintendent IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.3320 of 2025 Date of decision: 03.04.2025 …. Petitioners Versus …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners take action on their representation earned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Panchkula (Annexure P-5) in the present petition but the same has been taken thereon. He further would be satisfied if appropriate Superintendent of Police, Panchkula of the the s their representation has recently filed a representation on ) same has further satisfied if appropriate Panchkula Jyoti 2025.04.03 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP No.3320 of 2025 to decide the a necessary action thereon. 3. Notice of motion. 4. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to him during the course of the day. 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 03.04.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.3320 of 2025 decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioner necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent eedful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the supplied to him during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 27.03.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No CRWP No.3320 of 2025 -2- foresaid representation filed by the petitioners and take Mr. Apoorv Garg, Sr. D.A.G., Haryana, who is present in Court, accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits that the eedful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No and take who is present in Court, the paperbook be , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official them adequate security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.04.03 18:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document