APHC010551402012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] WEDNESDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 736, 732, 738, 739, 792 & 851/2012 Between: 1. CHINTHAPALLI GANGARATNAM, W/O.KAMESWARA RAO R/O.D.NO.9-3-118, MOTHER THERISA CENTRE, ASWARAOPET ROAD, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. SRI VENUGOPALA SWAMY TEMPLE, rep by its Manager O/o.Jangareddygudem, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2012(CMAMP 1186 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 111 days in re-submitting the CMASR No.5764/2012 in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2012(CMAMP 1410 OF 2012 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of execution of order dated 08.05.2007 in O.A.No.78 of 2005 on the file of Deputy Commissioner, Endowments Department, Kakinada, East Godavari District, pending disposal of themain CMA and pass suchother order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit andproper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 82 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt. 24/08/2012 passed in CMA.MP.No. 1410 of 2012 in CMA.No. 736 of 2012 Counsel for the Appellant: 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. P RADHIKA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 736, 732, 738, 739, 792 & 851/2012 COMMON JUDGMENT: In spite of posting the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the appellant. 2. Ms. Radhika, learned counsel appears for the respondents and submits that interim order granted by this Court stood vacated long back. 2. Though on earlier occasion i.e., on 17.11.2025, learned counsel for the appellant sought time to file fresh memo, no such memo has been filed and even there is no representation for the appellant today. It shows that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. In view of the same, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date: 19.11.2025 ANS 4 79 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NOs: 736, 732, 738, 739, 792 & 851/2012 Date: 19.11.2025 ANS