Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41530 (RAJ)

RAM KISHORE SON OF LATE SHRI MAHADEV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/68/2009 · 2025-10-10

Sanjeet Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41339] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 68/2009 1. 2. 2/1. 2/2. 2/3. 2/4. 2/5. Ram Kishore son of Late Shri Mahadev, resident of Gram Mahal, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. Laxmi Narain (Deceased) Bhuli wife of Late Sh. Laxmi Narain Hanuman Prasad Sharma son of Lare Sh. Laxmi Narain Phool Chand, Son Of Late Sh. Laxmi Narain Babu Lal Son Of Late Sh. Laxmi Narain. All Resident Of Gram Mahal, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. Smt. Laxma Daughter Of Late Sh. Laxmi Narain Wife Of Sh. Ramji, Resident Of Village Grah Tehsil, Bassi, District Jaipur. 2/6. Smt. Shanti Daughter Of Late Sh. Laxmi Narain Wife Of Sh. Phool Chand, Resident Of Village Basada, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur, Legal Representative Of Late Sh. Laxmi Narain. 3. Ram Rai Son Of Late Shri Mahadev, Resident Of Gram Mahal, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. 2. 3. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Urban Improvement & Housing Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. The Land Acquisition Officer, RIICO, 22 Godown, Jaipur. The Rajasthan State Industrial Development And Investment Corporation Ltd., Through Its Managing Director, Udhyog Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 4. The Jaipur Development Authority, Through Its Secretary, J.L.N. Marg, Indira Circle, Jaipur. 5. Radhika Chauhan Wife Of Shri Radheshyam Chauhan, Resident Of 22, Vidyut Nagar- C, Chitrakoot Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:41339] (2 of 2) [CW-68/2009] For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pallavi Mehta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Virendra Lodha, Sr. Adv. Assisted by Mr. Ankit Rathore Mr. Dharma Ram with Ms. Nandini Mirdha for Mr. Amit Kuri Mr. Nikhil Simlote, Adv for Mr. R.B. Mathur, Sr. Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 10/10/2025 Upon instructions, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks withdrawal of the present petition with liberty to approach this Court again, if occasion so arises. Learned counsel for the respondents does not oppose the said prayer. In view thereof, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J AVINASH GULERIA /31