Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4153 (BOM)

RAJENDRA VISHWANATH MOON v. RANJIT SINGH DEOL, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPT. OF SCHOOL EDUCATION AND SPORTS, MUMBAI AND ORS

CP/211/2025 · 2026-09-02

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(1) 37cp211.25 I N THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CONTEMPT PETITION NO.211 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1603 OF 2020 (D) Rajendra Vishwanath Moon VERSUS Ranjit Singh Deol, Principal Secretary, Dept. Of School Education And Sports, Mumbai And Ors --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ms Kirti Satpute, Advocate for petitioner. Mr. N. R. Patil, A.G.P. for respondents. Ms Madhuri Sawargaonkar, respondent No.3 is present. CORAM : ANIL L. PANSARE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 2, 2026. Heard. 2. The order of which contempt is alleged has been not complied with for the reason that the education department, where respondent No.3 is working as Deputy Director, has taken a decision to challenge the judgment. Accordingly, the Deputy Director informed the Education Officer vide communication dated 22.04.2025 that further steps cannot be taken. 3. That being so, it cannot be said that the respondents have willfully disobeyed the order. The respondents are in a process to challenge the order and they are entitled to do so. 4. In the circumstances, the petitioner cannot allege that the respondents have disobeyed the order muchless willfully. 5. The petition is accordingly dismissed. 6. In view of above, the undertaking given to this Court by respondent No.3 on 02.07.2026, need not be processed. Learned A.G.P, however, submits that if decision before the Supreme Court goes against the respondents, the amount due and payable to the petitioner will be paid, as early as possible. 7. The statement is accepted. (JUDGE) (JUDGE) Kahale Signed by: Kahale Designation: Senior Pvt. Secretary Date: 02/09/2026 16:11:45