( 2025:JHHC:38546 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 7376 of 2025 1. Anup Kumar Tiwari @ Anup Kumar Tiwary, @ Anup Tiwari, aged about 40 years, S/O- Nandkishor Tiwari, R/O.- P.O.-Chhatapather, P.S-Karon, Dist.- Deoghar, Jharkhand. 2. Ram Charan Tiwari @ Ram Charan Tiwary @ Ramjit Tiwary, aged about 56 years, S/O- Khedan Tiwari, R/O.- House no.-22, Ward No. 03, P.O.- Karanjo, Block- Palojori, Karanjo, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand. 3. Amjad Ansari @ Amjad Ansary @ Amjad Mian, aged about 31 years, S/O- Md. Lukman Ansari, R/O.- Chhatapathar, laharjori, P.O.- Karanjo, P.S.- Margomunda, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand. 4. Noor Mohammad @Noor Mohmed @ Md. Noor, aged about 35 years, S/O- Md. Ibrahim, R/O, Behrapahan, 86 Ibrahim manzil P.O.-Karanjo, P.S. Behrapahan, Dist.Deoghar, Jharkhand 5. Sorav Kumar Tiwari @ Sourabh Kumar Tiwary @ Sourabh Tiwary, aged about 24 years, S/O- Kartik Tiwari, R/O, Chhatapathar, Karanjo, P.O.- karanjo, Dist, Deoghar, Jharkhand, 6. Saddam Hussain @ Sadam Hussain @ Md.Sadam, aged about 31 years, S/O- lal Mohammad mian, R/O. Chhatapathar, P.O, Karanjo, Dist, Deoghar, Jharkhand, 7. Santosh Kumar Yadav, aged about 29 years, R/O,-Laharjori, karanjo, Karanjo, Dist.-Jharkhand, Deoghar, 8. Ram Bachan Tiwari @ Rambachan Tiwary, aged about 43 years,S/o- Nand Kishor Tiwari, R/O, Chhatapathar, Karanjo, Karon, Dist, Deoghar, Jharkhand,. ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Onkar Nath Tiwary, Advocate For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. 02/ 22.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Margomunda P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025, registered under sections 109(1), 132, 121(1), 121(2), 332(a), 191(2), 191(3), 190, 326(f), 303(2), 62, 61(2), 285, 221, 125(a), 125(b), 224, 127(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of BNS, 2023 of the I.P.C, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Madhupur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons and ( 2025:JHHC:38546 ) allegations are made that 450-500 persons were assembled at the place of occurrence and they were demanding compensation amount of Rs. 10,00,000/- for that altercation took place. He submits that petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 15 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there of pelting stone upon the police. 5. Considering that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons and allegations are made that 450-500 persons were assembled at the place of occurrence and petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 15 of the petition, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within four weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Madhupur, in connection with Margomunda P.S. Case No. 67 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.22.12.2025 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-