YASHIKA YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/3253/2025 · 2025-04-02
N S Shekhawat
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41527 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41527 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SR. No.112
CRWP-3253-2025 Date of decision:02.04.2025 Yashika Yadav and another …Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S. SHEKHAWAT Present: Mr. J.P. Jangu, Advocate for the petitioners.
N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J.
1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also to direct the private respondents not to interfere in their lives and liberty.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 29.03.2025 (Annexure P-4) to the Superintendent of Police, Rewari and the petitioners shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation (Annexure P-4).
3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only, at this stage.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Rajinder Kumar Banku, DAG, Haryana accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2025.04.02 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CRWP-3253-2025 -2-
6. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2-Superintendent of Police, Rewari is directed to depute a senior officer to look into the representation (Annexure P-4) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate orders, in accordance with law.
7. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any.
8. With these observations, this petition is disposed of.
(N.S. SHEKHAWAT) 02.04.2025 JUDGE mks Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES / NO Whether Reportable:
YES / NO MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2025.04.02 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh