Vempalli Ramanaiah (Ex-Sarpanch) v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/702/2023 · 2025-12-01
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41522 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41522 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010012392023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 702/2023 Between:
1. VEMPALLI RAMANAIAH (EX-SARPANCH), S/O VENKATA SUBBAIA , AGED ABOUT.- 65 YEARS, R/O GAJULAPELLORUVILLAGE, B.N KANDRIGA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI/CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. COMMISSIONER PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR, A.P.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI / CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
4. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER, TIRUPATHI /CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
5. THE DIVISIONAL PANCHAYATH OFFICER, TIRUPATHI DIVISION TIRUPATHI /CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
6. GAJULAPELLOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, B.N.KANDRIKA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI / CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
7. N SUBBARAO, SECRETARY GAJULAPELLORE, PANCHAYATH B.N.KANDRIKA MANDAL, TIRUPATHI / CHITTOOR DISTRICT
2
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents pending
consideration of the representation dated 15-12-2022 and take action as per the law ,as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 15-12-2022 and protect the family from the threat from the 7th respondent, due to the petitioner and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to conduct proper enquiry on representation dated 15- 12-2022 and direct the respondent to verify the panchayat funds last 5years bills as per Books, due to the pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to 1 to 3 appoint the enquiry officer either to the independent wing or any civil servant or judicial officer for conduct of free and transparent manner enquiry after following the principles of Natural justice with procedure of law and recover the amount from the 7th respondent due to the pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. G VENKATA REDDY
3. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
Sri Nagaraju Pullagura, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 02nd December, 2025 RKS