SMT. P.L. PUTTALAKSHAMMA v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
RP/288/2025 · 2025-12-11
E S Indiresh
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41519 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41519 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52599 RP No. 288 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO. 288 OF 2025 BETWEEN:
SMT. P.L. PUTTALAKSHAMMA, W/O. SRI. K.R. SUBBARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, KALLUDI GRAMA, KASABA HOBLI, GAURIBIDANUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 561 208. …PETITIONER (BY SRI NAGENDRA KUMAR K.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLPURA SUB DIVISION, CHIKKABALLAPURA, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.
3.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CHIKKABALLPURA, CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562 101.
4.
SMT GANGALAKSHMAMMA, W/O. SRI. K.G. GANGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT. KALLUDI GRAMA, KASABA HOBLI, GAURIBIDANUR TALUK, Digitally signed by SREEDHARAN BANGALORE SUSHMA LAKSHMI Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52599 RP No. 288 of 2025 CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 561 208.
5.
THE TAHASILDAR, GAURIBIDANUR TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT - 561 208. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R1-R3 & R5)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION.114 R/W ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 10.06.2025 IN WRIT PETITION IN WP NO.5811/2025 (KLR RES) PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT AND ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard learned counsels appearing for the respective parties.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the
order dated 10.06.2025 passed by this Court in WP.No.5811/2025.
3. Having taken note of the submissions made by learned counsels appearing for the respective parties and also taking into consideration the findings recorded by this Court in the above mentioned petition, as the suit between the parties is
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52599 RP No. 288 of 2025 pending for consideration before the competent Court, I find no reason for interference.
4. Accordingly the petition is dismissed. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE NM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13